Home Healthcare Is Under Pressure. Here Is Why That Makes Home Modification More Important, Not Less.
- Fritzi Gros-Daillon
- 5 hours ago
- 7 min read
There was a phrase in a Fortune article published in April that stopped me.
"The current system right now is unsustainable."
That was KPMG senior economist Matthew Nestler, speaking to Fortune about the home healthcare workforce - the home health aides, personal care workers, and elder care specialists who make it possible for older adults to remain at home when they need hands-on support. He was not referring to any single policy. He was describing a sector under-documented strain at the same moment it is being asked to carry more.
I want to be direct about what this blog is and isn't. It isn't about policy, and it isn't meant to alarm anyone. The pressures on the home healthcare workforce are real and worth understanding, but the reason I'm raising them here - for the builders, remodelers, designers, occupational therapists, and real estate professionals who work in aging-in-place - is practical. Because if you understand what is happening in home healthcare right now, the professional case for the work you do comes into sharper focus. And your clients deserve to understand it too.
What the Numbers Show
The Fortune reporting from April 2026, drawing on Bureau of Labor Statistics data and KPMG analysis by economist Matthew Nestler, paints a specific picture.
Healthcare overall - including home healthcare and elder care - has carried a disproportionate share of the U.S. labor market in recent years. The sector added 693,000 jobs in 2025 alone, against a total economy gain of 116,000 jobs. Without healthcare, the economy would have shed roughly 577,000 positions. Home healthcare is part of what has kept the labor market stable during an otherwise uncertain period. (Source: Fortune, April 19, 2026)
But within that growth, the pressure is visible. Weekly hours for home healthcare workers have dropped from a peak of around 30 per week in March 2023 to 28 today - the lowest level in nearly two decades. The sector added 7,000 home healthcare jobs in March 2026.
But 2024's monthly average was 12,900 new positions, and even that pace was considered insufficient to keep up with rising demand. (Source: Fortune / BLS data, April 19, 2026)
The demand, meanwhile, is not slowing. The oldest baby boomers - nearly 73 million people in total - are turning 80 this year. Personal healthcare spending for older adults already topped $1.2 trillion in 2020, or roughly $22,000 per person, according to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data cited in the Fortune article. The system is straining before the full weight arrives.
KPMG also found that 10% to 20% of workers in every industry are currently providing unpaid elder care - many of them Gen X and millennial professionals in management roles, filling gaps in the formal care system because no other option is available. (Source: KPMG care economy analysis, March 2026, cited in Fortune, April 19, 2026) That is not a statistic about people in other fields. It is a statistic about the families sitting across from you at a consultation.
What This Has to Do With the Home

The home healthcare workforce provides episodic, hands-on support. An aide arrives, assists with bathing or meal preparation or mobility, and then leaves. That support is valuable - for many families, it is essential. But it is bounded by hours, availability, and cost.
A well-modified home does something different. It provides consistent, passive support that doesn't clock in, doesn't reduce its available hours when the sector is stretched, and doesn't require a family member to reduce their own work hours to fill a gap. A grab bar is there at 3 AM. A no-step entry is available during a storm. A bathroom designed for function works whether an aide is scheduled or not.
This is not a claim that home modification replaces caregiving. It does not, and it should not be framed that way. What a well-modified home does is reduce the frequency and intensity of hands-on care needed for daily activities - the routine physical support that a poorly designed home makes unavoidable. The better a home is designed for the person living in it, the more they can do independently. And the more they can do independently, the less the formal care system needs to supply what the home should have been providing all along.
For occupational therapists, this is familiar clinical territory. The evidence supporting OT-led home assessment and modification programs is well-established. What I'm adding here is not clinical argument - it is context. The strain on the home healthcare workforce makes the functional independence that home modification supports more valuable, because the safety net has fewer available hours to catch what falls through.
For builders and remodelers, the argument holds as well. A client who asks you to modify a bathroom or widen a doorway is not asking you to compensate for a labor shortage. But the home you build or modify is part of a larger system of support. When that system is stretched, the quality of the home environment matters more at the margins.
What Clients May Be Carrying That They're Not Saying Out Loud
One of the things I observe in consulting work - and that many practitioners report in their own practices - is that families often arrive at the home modification conversation in the middle of something larger.
Sometimes it's the aftermath of a hospital discharge. Sometimes it's the moment when arranging paid home care turned out to be more complicated, more expensive, and less available than they expected. Sometimes it's a family member who has been quietly adjusting their work schedule to cover care gaps and has reached the point where that is no longer sustainable.
These conversations don't begin with 'I'd like to modify the bathroom.' They begin with something heavier - exhaustion, or fear, or a specific event that made the fragility of the current arrangement impossible to ignore.
What professionals trained in aging-in-place practice bring to those conversations is something concrete. They bring a framework for assessing what the home can do better - what it can absorb so the family doesn't have to, what it can prevent so an emergency call doesn't have to happen. That is not a sales pitch. It is a professional answer to a real problem.
The strain on the home healthcare sector makes those conversations more common. It doesn't create a market opportunity so much as it makes visible a need that has always been there - the gap between what a poorly designed home demands of the people living in it and what a well-designed home makes possible.
What "Reducing Care Dependency" Actually Looks Like in Practice
Let me be specific, because this can sound abstract.
A bathroom without grab bars in a home where the occupant has balance challenges typically requires either a paid aide or a family member to be present for showering. A bathroom with well-placed grab bars, a low-threshold shower, and appropriate seating allows that same person to bathe independently - safely, with dignity, without needing to schedule assistance for a daily activity.
A kitchen with accessible storage, adequate clearance for a walker or wheelchair, and surfaces at workable heights reduces the physical demand of meal preparation. What requires help in a poorly arranged kitchen may not require help at all in a better-designed one.
An entry without steps - or with a well-designed ramp or lift - means the home is accessible regardless of whether the person is recovering from a procedure, using a mobility aid, or simply having a day when the stairs are more than they can manage. That passive accessibility reduces care events, reduces falls, and reduces the frequency with which a family needs to arrange paid care hours for transitions, the home itself should accommodate.
None of these are dramatic or expensive modifications in isolation. Many are achievable within a moderate renovation scope. What they require is a professional who can assess the specific functional needs of a specific person in a specific home - and translate that assessment into a scope that addresses what actually matters. That is where professional training is indispensable.
A Note for Occupational Therapists
The strain on the home healthcare workforce has a specific relevance for OTs that I want to name directly. OTs conducting home assessments and writing modification recommendations are working at the intersection of the clinical and the practical. The evidence for OT-led home modification programs is strong. When the formal home healthcare system has fewer available hours, the work that OTs do - assessing, recommending, and advocating for modifications that support independent function - becomes a more critical intervention in the continuum of care.
This is also an argument for making your practice visible. For communicating the value of your assessment not just in clinical documentation, but to the families, referring physicians, and the builders and contractors who implement your work. The workforce shortage in home healthcare is not something occupational therapists caused or can fix. But it is context that gives home-based functional assessment a sharper edge - and a clearer professional argument.
If you are an OT who does this work regularly, or one who is considering deepening your practice in this area, CAPS III is the credential specifically designed to build home modification expertise for practitioners with clinical training. It builds on what you already know - functional assessment, activity analysis, the relationship between environment and independence - and adds the design and construction vocabulary that makes your recommendations actionable.
The conversation happening in the broader care system has a direct connection to the work you do - whether you build, design, assess, or modify homes for aging adults.
Understanding that connection, and having the framework to communicate it to clients, is part of what professional training in aging-in-place practice is built to provide.
Upcoming CAPS sessions - June 2026: CAPS I on June 12 (Friday) and June 24 (Wednesday start). CAPS II on June 19 (Friday) and June 25 (Wednesday). CAPS III on June 26. All sessions via Zoom. Register at householdguardians.com/caps-training.
If you are a practitioner with a specific consulting question, Fritzi offers one-to-one professional consulting: https://www.householdguardians.com/consulting
Fritzi Gros-Daillon, MS, CAPS, ECHM, SHSS, is an NAHB Master Instructor and 2019 NAHB Educator of the Year. She teaches every CAPS course personally.
